AJP - Endo AJP: Cell Physiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 270: E320-E327, 1996;
0193-1849/96 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Seeman, E.
Right arrow Articles by Tsalamandris, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Seeman, E.
Right arrow Articles by Tsalamandris, C.

AJP - Endocrinology and Metabolism, Vol 270, Issue 2 E320-E327, Copyright © 1996 by American Physiological Society


ARTICLES

Do genetic factors explain associations between muscle strength, lean mass, and bone density? A twin study

E. Seeman, J. L. Hopper, N. R. Young, C. Formica, P. Goss and C. Tsalamandris
Department of Medicine, Austin Hospital and Repatriation Medical Center, Melbourne, Australia.

Are the associations between muscle strength, lean mass, and bone mineral density (BMD) genetically determined? Based on within-pair differences in 56 monozygotic (MZ) and 56 dizygotic (DZ) female twin pairs, mean age 45 yr (range 24-67), BMD was associated with lean mass, independent of fat mass and height (P < 0.05). A 10% increment in femoral neck (FN) BMD was associated with a 15% increment in lean mass (approximately 6 kg). BMD was associated with muscle strength (measured in 35 pairs) before, but not after, adjusting for lean mass. Based on age-adjusted cross-sectional analyses, same-trait correlations (+/- SE) in MZ pairs were double those in DZ pairs: FN BMD (0.62 +/- 0.08, 0.33 +/- 0.12) and lean mass (0.87 +/- 0.03, 0.30 +/- 0.11; all P < 0.001), consistent with a genetic hypothesis. The cross-trait correlation (r) between lean mass and FN BMD in the same individual was 0.43 +/- 0.06. The cross-trait cross-twin correlation between lean mass in one twin and FN BMD in the other was 0.31 +/- 0.07 in MZ pairs, approximately 75% of the cross-trait correlation (r) and 0.19 +/- 0.09 in DZ paris (P < 0.001). After adjusting for height and fat mass, the MZ and DZ cross-trait cross-twin correlations were no different (0.16 +/- 0.08 and 0.13 +/- 0.09, respectively). Therefore, genetic factors account for 60-80% of the individual variances of both FN BMD and lean mass, and > 50% of their covariance. The association between greater muscle mass and greater BMD is likely to be determined by genes regulating size.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Appl. Physiol.Home page
A. D. G. Baxter-Jones, J. C. Eisenmann, R. L. Mirwald, R. A. Faulkner, and D. A. Bailey
The influence of physical activity on lean mass accrual during adolescence: a longitudinal analysis
J Appl Physiol, August 1, 2008; 105(2): 734 - 741.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Appl. Physiol.Home page
S. J. Prior, S. M. Roth, X. Wang, C. Kammerer, I. Miljkovic-Gacic, C. H. Bunker, V. W. Wheeler, A. L. Patrick, and J. M. Zmuda
Genetic and environmental influences on skeletal muscle phenotypes as a function of age and sex in large, multigenerational families of African heritage
J Appl Physiol, October 1, 2007; 103(4): 1121 - 1127.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Appl. Physiol.Home page
S. Walsh, E. J. Metter, L. Ferrucci, and S. M. Roth
Activin-type II receptor B (ACVR2B) and follistatin haplotype associations with muscle mass and strength in humans
J Appl Physiol, June 1, 2007; 102(6): 2142 - 2148.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
W. A. Bauman, A. M. Spungen, J. Wang, R. N. Pierson Jr., and E. Schwartz
Relationship of fat mass and serum estradiol with lower extremity bone in persons with chronic spinal cord injury
Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab, June 1, 2006; 290(6): E1098 - E1103.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Appl. Physiol.Home page
M. C. Kostek, M. J. Delmonico, J. B. Reichel, S. M. Roth, L. Douglass, R. E. Ferrell, and B. F. Hurley
Muscle strength response to strength training is influenced by insulin-like growth factor 1 genotype in older adults
J Appl Physiol, June 1, 2005; 98(6): 2147 - 2154.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Appl. Physiol.Home page
E. Seeman
Invited Review: Pathogenesis of osteoporosis
J Appl Physiol, November 1, 2003; 95(5): 2142 - 2151.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Drug Metab. Dispos.Home page
J. A. Eisman
Pharmacogenetics of the Vitamin D Receptor and Osteoporosis
Drug Metab. Dispos., April 1, 2001; 29(4): 505 - 512.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
J. Appl. Physiol.Home page
A. M. Spungen, J. Wang, R. N. Pierson Jr., and W. A. Bauman
Soft tissue body composition differences in monozygotic twins discordant for spinal cord injury
J Appl Physiol, April 1, 2000; 88(4): 1310 - 1315.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NEJMHome page
A. G. Uitterlinden, H. Burger, Q. Huang, F. Yue, F. E.A. McGuigan, S. F.A. Grant, A. Hofman, J. P.T.M. van Leeuwen, H. A.P. Pols, and S. H. Ralston
Relation of Alleles of the Collagen Type I{alpha}1 Gene to Bone Density and the Risk of Osteoporotic Fractures in Postmenopausal Women
N. Engl. J. Med., April 9, 1998; 338(15): 1016 - 1021.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online