AJP - Endocrinology and Metabolism, Vol 261, Issue 3 E402-E409, Copyright © 1991 by American Physiological Society

ARTICLES

Energy expenditure by doubly labeled water: validation in lean and obese subjects

E. Ravussin, I. T. Harper, R. Rising and C. Bogardus
Clinical Diabetes and Nutrition Section, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Phoenix, Arizona 85016.

The doubly labeled water (2H2(18)O) method to assess energy expenditure in free-living conditions has been successfully validated against gas exchange measurements in lean healthy volunteers in both sedentary conditions and during sustained heavy exercise. However, no data are available on obese subjects. We therefore compared the 2H2(18)O method with indirect calorimetry (respiratory chamber) in 12 male subjects covering a wide range of body weight and composition (61-190 kg, 7-41% fat). Isotope pool sizes and elimination rates were calculated from 18O and 2H enrichments in baseline urine samples and in 7-h, 11.5-h, and daily postdose urine samples using the multipoint slope/intercept method. Results were corrected for isotopic fractionation. Mean 7-day energy expenditure in the respiratory chamber varied from 1,851 to 4,105 kcal/day. The doubly labeled water method tended to underestimate energy expenditure (-2.5 +/- 5.8%, not equal to 0, range -14 to +4%), with the larger underestimate observed in heavier and fatter subjects (r = -0.82 and -0.68, P less than 0.02, respectively). The underestimation in heavier subjects might be related to larger sequestration of deuterium during fat synthesis. In conclusion, the doubly labeled water method is a suitable and accurate method to measure energy expenditure in free-living conditions but might provide a slightly underestimated figure in fatter subjects.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				D. L. Johannsen, J. P. DeLany, M. I. Frisard, M. A. Welsch, C. K. Rowley, X. Fang, S. M. Jazwinski, E. Ravussin, and The Louisiana Healthy Aging Study Physical activity in aging: Comparison among young, aged, and nonagenarian individuals J Appl Physiol, August 1, 2008; 105(2): 495 - 501. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. D. Salbe, C. Weyer, I. Harper, R. S. Lindsay, E. Ravussin, and P. A. Tataranni Assessing Risk Factors for Obesity Between Childhood and Adolescence: II. Energy Metabolism and Physical Activity Pediatrics, August 1, 2002; 110(2): 307 - 314. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. Blanc, A. S. Colligan, J. Trabulsi, T. Harris, J. E. Everhart, D. Bauer, and D. A. Schoeller Influence of delayed isotopic equilibration in urine on the accuracy of the 2H218O method in the elderly J Appl Physiol, March 1, 2002; 92(3): 1036 - 1044. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. E Hise, D. K Sullivan, D. J Jacobsen, S. L Johnson, and J. E Donnelly Validation of energy intake measurements determined from observer-recorded food records and recall methods compared with the doubly labeled water method in overweight and obese individuals Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, February 1, 2002; 75(2): 263 - 267. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. Kroke, K. Klipstein-Grobusch, S. Voss, J. Moseneder, F. Thielecke, R. Noack, and H. Boeing Validation of a self-administered food-frequency questionnaire administered in the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC) Study: comparison of energy, protein, and macronutrient intakes estimated with the doubly labeled water, urinary nitrogen, and repeated 24-h dietary recall methods Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, October 1, 1999; 70(4): 439 - 447. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. B Going, S. Levin, J. Harrell, D. Stewart, L. Kushi, C. E Cornell, S. Hunsberger, C. Corbin, and J. Sallis Physical activity assessment in American Indian schoolchildren in the Pathways study Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, April 1, 1999; 69 (4): 788S - 795S. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				E. C Rush, L. D Plank, and W A. Coward Energy expenditure of young Polynesian and European women in New Zealand and relations to body composition Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, January 1, 1999; 69(1): 43 - 48. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]