AJP - Endo Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 260: E440-E446, 1991;
0193-1849/91 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Miura, H.
Right arrow Articles by Sakamoto, N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Miura, H.
Right arrow Articles by Sakamoto, N.

AJP - Endocrinology and Metabolism, Vol 260, Issue 3 E440-E446, Copyright © 1991 by American Physiological Society


ARTICLES

CNS stimulation does not affect hepatic venous glucose concentration in severely diabetic rats

H. Miura, A. Iguchi, K. Uemura, A. Yatomi, T. Tamagawa and N. Sakamoto
Third Department of Internal Medicine, Nagoya University School of Medicine, Japan.

To assess the role of the central nervous system (CNS) in carbohydrate metabolism in diabetes, neostigmine was injected into the third cerebral ventricle in fed rats with streptozotocin (STZ; 80 mg/kg)-induced diabetes under pentobarbital sodium anesthesia. Changes in hepatic venous plasma glucose concentrations were monitored. Neostigmine injection caused no significant changes in the hepatic venous plasma glucose concentration in untreated diabetic rats, whereas the glucose level increased significantly in insulin-treated diabetic rats similarly to the changes in normal control animals. In diabetic rats, the plasma levels of glucagon, epinephrine, and norepinephrine were increased significantly by neostigmine. After various doses (35-80 mg/kg) were given to rats, it was found that the higher the STZ dose, the lower was the hepatic glycogen content and the smaller was the glycemic response to neostigmine. Our results indicate that, in severe diabetes, CNS stimulation with neostigmine fails to increase hepatic glucose output, because glycogen stores are nearly exhausted and gluconeogenesis is already maximal.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online